David's
Mental Meanderings 29th July 2001 Mrs
Holford and I were shopping in town recently and we walked by a shoe store. I
noticed that the prices in the window were particularly outrageous. The prices
I noticed were not for women’s shoes, but for children’s. And not for big children
– these were for toddlers. And no, I wasn’t looking at miniature Air Jordans (or
whatever the hot sports shoe is now). These were plain little sandals. There is
more leather in my key chain. A child could probably fit in these for all of five
or six months. Then somebody has to go out an buy another pair. Is
it just me or are kids expensive? Looking at things like this is enough to take
away any motivation to fulfil the Dominion Mandate to fill the earth. I
was pondering this a few minutes later, but hadn’t said anything to the Mrs. We
had picked up some sandwiches and fruit drinks from Marks and Spencer and were
sitting on a bench in the pedestrianized area of the City Centre. A small group
of teenagers were loitering across from us. They were all dressed fairly slovenly,
sporting jewellery embedded in various parts of their faces, and interrupting
their conversations to answer mobile phones. It
was Mrs Holford who then commented that kids are not really net contributors to
society. She noted that they take, take, take with very little gratitude and opined
that they are more trouble than they are worth. Apparently,
you don’t even have to wait until they are teenagers before they can cause a lot
of trouble. The big news over here recently was the huge debate over releasing
Robert Thompson and John Venables from custody. They have been locked up for eight
years for murdering a two-year-old. They are only now eighteen. There
is a nine-year-old who has had a court order placed on him because he has terrorised
his neighbourhood and people cannot even go out of their houses. And even a seven-year-old
who has been kicked out of eight different schools. All
this considered, there is a lot to commend our lifestyle as “tinks” (two incomes
no kids). Even if they don’t turn out to be felons, life without children is easier.
Just think in terms of travel. We go where we want, when we want, and don’t have
to lug around any extra stuff. No having to say, “If you don’t shut up right now,
I’m going to turn this car around and go home!” No whining, no fussing, no crying.
No free taxi service to useless lessons in skills and talents that will never
be utilised. (And no paying for useless lessons in skills and talents that will
never be utilised.) Later, no handing over the car keys and holding my breath
til it arrives back unscratched. And
no paying insurance deductibles when it doesn’t arrive back unscratched. From
what I recall, kids result in a change in the food budget. Mrs Holford and I eat
pretty much whatever we want. We spend less than £30 a week on groceries. I’ve
been around a lot of families and I’ve seen the children hoover the food up off
the table and into their disgestive tracts. Apparently this is an escalating problem,
as the older they get the more they eat. I have no clue how the average family
can afford teenagers. Definitely more expensive than guinea pigs. And
finally there is the extra space. Guinea pigs stay in a hutch. They can even go
in the back garden. Children eventually need a bedroom. Sure, you can stack them
two or three deep thanks to the marvellous invention of bunk beds, but still they
require additional space. Eventually this means getting a bigger house and a bigger
mortgage. This all begins
to get a bit a depressing the more I think about it. I’m
sure there is a positive side to having children. I suppose Mrs Holford and I
will find out in about 25 weeks. |